Monday, January 26, 2015

Modern Spolia :Why Constantine and Theodoric Would Have Loved Thrift Stores



Yet another modern growing trend is the new found desire for the reclaimed. Folk music, barrel tables, Edison lamps, pipes, etc. are hardly things of this century, yet this image has become synonymous with the modern millennial. And not a collection of high-dollar, Antiques Road Show items. No, instead it is the used and battered utilitarian drum of a mining cart that’s in the corner of a New York loft. I fabricate the “worn” look on work all the time as an artist/money-maker. Thrift stores and second-hand merchants are prime targets. Cheap and sachet, even used clothing is exciting. Out with the new, in with the old.
However we are hardly the first society to ask our grandparents for their old junk. A notable proponent of this kind of old-is-the-new-black craze is none other than Roman Emperor Constantine I. It can be seen through visual evidence that he put forth a massive building initiative in the fourth century, not to create a new twist on classical style as every other ruler before him, but instead he used all of their styles, mixed them all together and called it his. This kind of reuse of older building materials is to spoliate, not unlike taking spoils of war, or leftovers. Constantine used spolia rampantly in the Latern Basilica and his famous Arch. The spolia had several uses, as written on by Beat Brenk, including legitimizing his rule, showing off power, and conservation, but an especially notable feature is that it just looked cool.
“[Spolia] are to be considered seriously as a new artistic medium which by the character of tradition and time-honored norms could be transmitted to a building: a new aesthetics, operating not with the concept of the brand-new but rather with the concept of the reuse.”
There is a look that comes along with something you didn't necessarily grow up with. A kind of mysterious life that the object brings to the current age. What has this thing seen? Were people as fond of it then as I am now? What does this being in my living room say about me to my friends?
I would say having the 1920's door as a headboard does the exact same things a remounted relief carving does. One, it relates you to a time when things weren't as complex and planned obsolescence was unthinkable. In Roman times, the Empire had been split in two, led by multiple rulers, and infiltrated with all kinds of new people and thoughts from their colonialism that the only remnant of “Good Old Rome” was in the centuries old monuments. In the same way, I may think it’s scary that everything I touch was made in a factory and that my obsidian black rectangle knows my name, so making a table from a broken wheelbarrow brings me to the here and now in a way the other things couldn't. Stability and simplicity are found under years of dust. Also, used things silently put forth that your ideas, feelings, and beliefs about how the world works are more in line with folks from way before your time than they are with now, and thus the way you think now is backed up with history. Constantine and, later on, Theodoric, found that aligning themselves with familiar imagery made the emperors (and their beliefs) more acceptable. Constantine built entire churches from former recognizable materials. This made attendees feel at least vaguely at home in this new radical religion and, I presume, it also implied that every ruler and era prior that point in time had been pointing to this idea, this belief, this building. As millennials, every old thing we have is proof that we are from a lineage of other humans before us. We can testify with these objects that the end of our lives doesn’t mean the end of our affecting someone else’s life. We aren’t as fleeting as our times.

Minia(na)ture Sculpture


There seems to be a fad among contemporary sculptors to use forced perspective to make notably unprofound objects seem grandiose because of the miniature worlds placed upon them. Looking through various posts, articles, and even at my peers’ work, there seems to be a lean toward creating small clusters of activity for the viewer to peek into and happen upon a tiny, precious civilization or biome.
SEKAI by Maico Akiba
Maico Akiba in his “SEKAI” (“world”) series, fashions pre-made animal action figures into bearers of society with the use of the green fluff found in model sets. Visually there is an obvious whole object, in this case, the triceratops. Though not a significant thing in itself, the dinosaur seems massive, benevolent, and even graceful compared to the twig trees and minuscule homes it hoists on its back, not even noticing their presence. Contrasting with the lumbering mass that is carrying it, the village is jewel-like and visually complex.
Another artist is Kyle Kirkpatrick, who, instead of beasts, uses books. However the notion is the same. A small mass is carrying occupants that force the mass to seem enormous.
Kyle Kirkpatrick
So also Pierre Javelle and Akiko Ida, but with food…
Minimiam series

And Patrick Jacobs and Kevin LCK and Dalton Ghetti and Slinkachu and…
Why?
What makes this such a thing?
This trend has happened before in book and film. The Borrowers, Honey, I Shrunk The Kids, and Stuart Little all are about people (or mice) who are having to undergo the same level of treacheries and dangers as the rest of us.
The Borrowers (1997)
We aren't having to run from grasshoppers per se, but the conclusion is that even if you were so small no one could see you, if you could all but disappear from the hum-drum of today, you would still face the anxiety, loneliness, and peril that haunts every person. On the same note, no matter how small you would be, the difference you would make could still be enormous. Influence can still be had despite size. That is why films like these are so popular with children and why these sculptures seem so playful. Who else knows powerlessness via size and knowledge better than kids? Doll houses and G.I. Joes. These personalities are miniaturized for the perspective of being able to, vicariously, look down upon ourselves to see both how fragile we are, but also how significant. And how, in the case of the sculptures, we are both very real and very cared for.
Triceratops’ with villages on their backs are also just cool.


Sources:

Wednesday, January 21, 2015

Drawings

Can't forget the good old pen, pencil, conte, charcoal, guache, eraser, chalk, paper, finger, protractor........






















Sunday, January 18, 2015

Jezreel Weapons

 

Over the summer of 2013 I had the thought of reconstructing weaponry. It was like it thwacked me over the head, I was reading through Isaiah 2:3-4 (below) about turning swords into plowshares and spears into pruning hooks. The modern equivalent to a sword is a gun. We don't use pruning hooks but we do use shovels and rakes. And the idea blossomed from there. Initially it was just a new way of reinforcing the idea of Shalom, an active, prevalent rightness with the Lord and with people as described in Genesis (Eden) and here in Isaiah.



However it became clear that this, as a body of work, wouldn't hold up for long. There were only two components, the gun and the shovel it was beaten into. Together they would merely say "make vegetables, not war" and it would go into the ocean of M-16 guitars and trumpet guns. Thus there needed to be a 3rd element.

I realized that ideologically taking a weapon used for destruction and molding it into a tool for bearing fruit is very much like what God has done to me through Jesus. I, like Paul (as we'll soon see) or any other Christian for that matter, was once against God and bent on evil. However, He chose not to destroy me but rather redeem me for His purposes. This is the gun-shovel in essence. Visually, I also discovered that covering the surface of the sculpture in ornamentation would add texture and depth (see work of Kris Kuksi). The viewer could see the initial shape, add the gun + shovel, then move in closer for a third element. So I eventually made military spolia into fruit-bearing tools with relief carvings of stories of redemption. The testimony of Paul and the story of the cracked pot that watered flowers adorn the clay pieces.






It was also around that time that the sculptures' preciousness, the fact that it is a religious thing, and "let us go up to the mountain of the Lord" sounds an awful lot like a pilgrimage brought  me to the  conclusion of making these items into relics. The texture is there in the adornment and detail, the story is there in the overall shape (the narrative relief was redundant), and it gives off the idea of sacred.






 This peace we all want cannot be reached by ourselves. Only in Christ can this be achieved. Only in Him can we bear fruit. Thus the title of these pieces collectively is "Jezreel" or "God sows".






 Many peoples will come and say,“Come, let us go up to the mountain of the Lord,
   to the temple of the God of Jacob.

He will teach us his ways,

    so that we may walk in his paths.”

The law will go out from Zion,

    the word of the Lord from Jerusalem.

He will judge between the nations
    and will settle disputes for many peoples.
They will beat their swords into plowshares
    and their spears into pruning hooks.
Nation will not take up sword against nation,
    nor will they train for war anymore.



Side notes: I remember pointedly that never had I ever more wanted shalom and the Kingdom to come than after the gun violence of Sandy Hook. 

I own three guns. I am not against owning them per se. A part of living in this world of sin and death is having to kill animals to eat them and having to protect your family from harm. I pray for the day when any offensive weapon will no longer be necessary.

Tuesday, January 13, 2015

Investment

“Bad Christian art that reflects a lack of investment of time, commitment, craft, or skill, presents the illusion that the Christian life is not worthy or requiring of the same,” writes author and literature professor Karen Swallow Prior.

A quote in the article about how design should matter more to Christians.
Read more at http://www.relevantmagazine.com/culture/design-should-matter-more-christians#W9KzQr1QrKeKpOVo.99



Monday, January 12, 2015

Stuck in High School


Junior

In an attempt to merge Christ into my work in high school, I developed some interesting and potentially blasphemous works.

Initially intrigued by a phenomenon in nature where cracks in the ground, lightening, and even galaxies form branches bursting outward, known simply as fractals, I saw this as a way God put a little visible signature on everything created. In the Italian Renaissance, artists portrayed the heavenly realms as perfect and geometric. I tend to swing toward Gaudi's observation that nothing in nature, save the horizon, is a straight line, thus my renderings were fully organic tree forms. They emitted their own light, as they can only be seen by way of themselves. These (here's the blasphemy) usually represented either the Trinity or one Person of the Deity in a surrealistic composition.



These, after being urged to "push it more", became more three- dimensional and abstracted as time went on.




Senior

Eventually the branches began to fade away and, with some influence from urban graffiti, give rise to the conclusive work of my years in high school. Far more expressive, these "carpentry paintings" settled on usually one concept or emotion I was feeling about God at that time. It had, along with my growth as a believer, branched out from stating stale information to becoming more vibrant and feeling. I felt the love of the Lord, and it showed in my work.





Visit http://forthdistrict.com/peoples-district-ben-hancock/ for more detailed information behind the later concepts.